This seems to be an ongoing theme here throughout the
years I have been writing this blog, but man how the time does fly! Take a
month off for the holidays, and suddenly, it’s almost three months later before
I sit down to finally get something written down. I haven’t been totally quiet
though. Obviously still doing my gaming streams and videos, but rotating back
to engaging in some interesting conversations elsewhere around the Internet,
which brings us to this point. My original plan for this entry being
pushed off for later because of one of those interesting conversations. But
first ….
It’s interesting how things can come full circle, I suppose.
In my last blog entry, I made mention of how I don’t blindly believe people who
claim (rightly or otherwise) to be victims in situations where I have no knowledge
of the events that transpired. I prefer to wait for the facts to be uncovered
or otherwise present themselves. And now here we have one of the very
situations where this comes to pass with the recent episode involving Empire actor Jussie Smollett. Many
people, including other actors and politicians were quick to jump on the Social
Media bandwagon and induce rage about hate crimes and modern day lynchings. It’s
funny however, now that the truth is beginning to come out how these very same
people doing this within hours of the incident being made public are now
refusing to comment until “all the facts are known.” Hypocrisy at its finest!
Thank God the chief of the Chicago Police Department isn’t afraid to call
bullshit when he sees it. Props to that man, and the entire CPD for coming out
in this climate where doing so is only inviting being ostracized and dragged
through the mud slinging media. I shudder to think of the absolute disaster
this incident could have caused if Smollett has staged this incident with white
men as the attackers.
That being said, this does bring us to the point of today’s
piece, which may not entirely be unrelated to genuine hate crimes. During my internet travels over the last
couple of months, I was perusing one of my favorite gaming news sites and came
across an article from one of the writers that really fired up the gaming
community, me included. Essentially what was said in the piece was that we, as
in people who enjoy playing games, cannot identify as Gamers because “Gamer” is
not a real identity. Meaning I can identify as a White American Male, but I
cannot also qualify that with Gamer. Needless to say there was a lot of back on
forth from the community in the comments section on this issue, partially
stemming from the fact that the writer made a very poor attempt at defending
his argument in the piece itself. At the end of the day, most of the community
came to the consensus that the writer was full of shit, and that Gamer is
indeed a valid identity one can use to describe oneself. However, during the
debate process there was a distinct overtone that sure we can identify as
Gamers, but that identity is not as important as a racial or sexual identity.
Part of the reasoning for that argument was that there are certain things about
who you are that are unchangeable and as such are meaningful identities.
While I agree with that on some level, I had an issue
with the way some of the arguments were being made. Now some of the issues arose from the fact
that Gamers are not a marginalized group like the LBGT and African American
communities are, and that’s perfectly true. But along with that, many people
were trying to invalidate what we as Gamers have personally experienced in our
lives. And I would go even further to other groups – like the Native American,
and the Chinese American. These are two other groups that have been as
marginalized, if not more in some cases than the “Big Two”, yet there is hardly
mention of any of that. Yeah, slavery was very bad, but what happened to the
Native American in this country, much of which was instituted by the American
government was at the very least just as bad. Yet, because the Native American
community doesn’t bitch and moan like the others, all that is easily pushed
aside and forgotten.
I’m just wondering at what point does a crime become a
hate crime? The Smollett incident showcases this perfectly. Here’s a guy that
is allegedly attacked for what he is – black and gay. We have laws on the books
that now make this type of targeted attack a hate crime, and thus the resulting
punishment is worse than your normal everyday mugging in a back alley. He was
attacked because of who he was; because of his identity. Five years ago, a tech
blogger was attacked in a bar in San Francisco while she was wearing a Google
Glass (yup that failure of a consumer device, but that’s beside the point). She
characterized the attack as a hate crime, which many questioned at the time.
Why wouldn’t it be though? It is highly doubtful that she would have been
assaulted had she not been wearing the device. Some expressed a concern about
the recording features of the device, but what if it was her cell phone?
Everyone has a cell out nowadays and doesn’t think twice about the possibility
of being recorded. It’s doubtful that the assault would have transpired if she
had anything else but the Google Glass.
I myself was the victim of no less than three assaults
during my grade school years. I was one of the shy, nerdy kids and because of
this was one of the easy targets by the more popular and athletic crowd. One
time I was entering the bathroom and, as I opened the door, was grabbed and
thrown to the floor by another classmate. In another incident, on the last day
of the school year, just as we were leaving school to get on the bus to go
home, I was punched squarely in the stomach by another classmate and left
reeling for several minutes as others walked by, unconcerned. I was hit so
hard, I couldn’t even breathe properly due to the pain and had in fact lost
hold of my report card which was in my hand at the time. It took me another few
minutes, after I had finally recovered enough to stand and look for it that I
finally found it several feet from where I had been assaulted. A third incident
involved a group of classmates essentially beating and kicking me one day for
what seemed like several minutes until a teacher was able to intervene. Each
one of these attacks was prompted solely by who I was. A white, shy, nerdy kid.
Does that qualify as a hate crime? Other people had similar stories of
themselves or friends being attacked simply because of their Gaming
proliferation. Just a few months ago, down in Florida, there was a mass
shooting that targeted a Gaming convention and resulted in the deaths of at
least two Gamers.
Again, Gamers are by no means a marginalized group, but
does that mean attacks against us are any less hateful than those against
minority groups? Some argued that since we can choose not to play games, that
we can’t use Gamer as an identity as opposed to those unchangeable identifiers
like our race, gender, and sexual orientation. But if that’s the case, if I
have to identify as a White, Hetero, Male because that’s how I was born and
that cannot be changed, doesn’t that mean transgendered people can no longer
identify with the gender they prefer to be and can only identify as the gender
of which they were born? The fact of the matter is that, as far as I know, our
race is the only thing we can’t change about ourselves right now, and even that
may be likely to change far in the future with scientific advances. If I were
to get a sex change and become a woman, what would my identity be? I am a male
and feel quite comfortable being one. I am attracted to women and enjoy the
company of my female wife. If I were to surgically become a woman regardless of
that, what would my identity be then? I would still be attracted to women, so
at that point I guess I would then become a Lesbian, would I not?
In truth, I could stop playing games. I could stop
streaming and making videos related to my passion as a Gamer. But truth be
told, my identity as a Gamer is so ingrained within me as a person that it
would be no different than me getting that sex change and becoming the world’s
ugliest Lesbian. I could change my gender, but it wouldn’t change who am I deep
inside any more than not playing games would stop making me a Gamer. Some
people say “It’s just my job, it’s not who I am” by way of saying that their
professional choice in life doesn’t necessarily define them as a person. I
agree with that to some extent in that my current job is certainly not one
that, given a choice, I would choose to do. But in the end I think that
everything we do does make up some part of our identity, and no one part of it
is any less important than any other part with how we ultimately identify
ourselves. And no one’s identity is any more or less important than any other
identity on the face of this planet, regardless of race, gender, sexual
orientation, or passion.
No comments:
Post a Comment